William Shakespeare, the legendary playwright whose works have captivated audiences for centuries, remains an enigma even in death. The Bard‘s final resting place at the Church of the Holy Trinity in Stratford-upon-Avon is shrouded in mystery, with a peculiar curse inscribed on his gravestone and a shocking revelation about his missing skull. In this blog post, we‘ll delve into the intriguing tale of Shakespeare‘s grave and the enduring mystery that surrounds it.
The Life and Mysterious Death of William Shakespeare
Born on April 26, 1564, in Stratford-upon-Avon, England, William Shakespeare went on to become one of the most influential writers in history. His plays and sonnets have left an indelible mark on literature and continue to be performed and studied worldwide. However, the circumstances of his death on April 23, 1616, at the age of 52, remain largely unknown.
The only clue to Shakespeare‘s cause of death comes from the vicar of Stratford, who noted in his diary that the Bard, along with fellow writers Michael Drayton and Ben Jonson, had a "merry meeting" and "drank too hard," leading to a fever that ultimately claimed Shakespeare‘s life (Schoenbaum, 1991). This account, however, is unverified and leaves much room for speculation.
The Curse on Shakespeare‘s Gravestone
One of the most intriguing aspects of Shakespeare‘s grave is the curse inscribed on his gravestone. The epitaph reads:
"Good friend for Jesus sake forbeare,
To dig the dust enclosed here.
Blessed be the man that spares these stones,
And cursed be he that moves my bones." (Zolkover, 2016)
It is widely believed that Shakespeare himself penned these lines, possibly to prevent his remains from being exhumed and moved to a different location, a common practice during that time. The curse serves as a stern warning to anyone who might disturb the Bard‘s eternal rest, promising divine retribution to those who dare to move his bones.
Curses were a common motif in Shakespearean literature, reflecting the superstitions and beliefs of the Elizabethan and Jacobean eras. In plays such as "Macbeth" and "Richard III," curses play a pivotal role in shaping the characters‘ fates and the overall narrative (Greenblatt, 2004). Shakespeare‘s decision to include a curse on his own gravestone suggests a deep-rooted belief in the power of such imprecations and a desire to protect his mortal remains from disturbance.
The Peculiarities of Shakespeare‘s Grave
Shakespeare‘s grave is notable for several unusual features. Unlike the graves of his family members buried nearby, Shakespeare‘s grave does not bear his name. This curious omission has led to speculation about the reasons behind the anonymity. Some scholars suggest that the absence of a name was a deliberate choice, meant to emphasize the importance of the curse and the Bard‘s desire to remain undisturbed (Orlin, 2021).
Furthermore, Shakespeare‘s grave is surprisingly short, measuring less than a meter in length, which is shorter than his wife Anne Hathaway‘s grave. This peculiarity has raised questions about the positioning of Shakespeare‘s remains and whether they were buried in a traditional manner. Some theories propose that the grave‘s unusual size could be attributed to the practice of "charnel houses," where bones were often stacked or reinterred to save space (Tarlow, 2011).
Another striking aspect of Shakespeare‘s burial is the absence of a coffin. It is believed that the Bard and his family members were buried in winding sheets or similar shrouds, rather than the customary coffins of the time. This practice was not uncommon in the 17th century, particularly among the lower classes, as coffins were often seen as a luxury (Houlbrooke, 1998).
The Missing Skull: A Shocking Discovery
For four centuries, Shakespeare‘s grave remained undisturbed, with the church authorities respecting the Bard‘s wishes and denying numerous requests for excavation. However, on the 400th anniversary of his death in 2016, a non-invasive ground-penetrating radar (GPR) scan of the grave revealed a startling discovery: Shakespeare‘s skull was missing (Kennedy, 2016).
The GPR scan, conducted by a team of archaeologists from Staffordshire University, showed that the skull had been removed from the grave at some point in the past. The findings sent shockwaves through the literary world and sparked a renewed interest in the mystery surrounding Shakespeare‘s final resting place.
Experts have offered various explanations for the missing skull. Some suggest that it could have been removed during repairs or renovations to the church, while others propose that grave robbers may have targeted the Bard‘s remains. The discovery has also led researchers to investigate historical accounts and rumors surrounding the fate of Shakespeare‘s skull.
The Tale of the Stolen Skull
One of the most intriguing theories about Shakespeare‘s missing skull stems from a story published in Argosy Magazine in 1879. The article claimed that in 1794, a group of grave robbers led by a man named Dr. Frank Chambers had stolen Shakespeare‘s skull on behalf of a wealthy collector, who paid the hefty sum of 300 guineas for the relic (Argosy Magazine, 1879).
The story gained renewed attention in light of the GPR scan findings, prompting researchers to examine the details of the account more closely. A follow-up article in The Gentleman‘s Magazine (1884) suggested that Chambers, overcome with guilt or fear, had hidden the skull in St. Leonard‘s Church in Beoley, Worcestershire.
In 2009, archaeologists examined a skull found in a vault at St. Leonard‘s Church, hoping to determine if it could be Shakespeare‘s missing cranium. However, upon closer inspection, the "Beoley skull" was determined to belong to a 70-year-old woman, based on its physical characteristics and the presence of a single tooth (Regan, 2016). Despite this setback, the search for Shakespeare‘s skull continues, with scholars and enthusiasts alike eager to unravel the mystery.
Shakespeare‘s Legacy and the Allure of Mystery
The enigma surrounding Shakespeare‘s grave and the missing skull has only added to the Bard‘s enduring legacy. The curse on his gravestone and the tales of grave robbery have captured the imaginations of generations, fueling a fascination with the man behind the timeless works.
Shakespeare‘s plays and sonnets continue to be performed, studied, and adapted worldwide, with an estimated 4 billion copies of his works sold globally (British Council, 2016). The Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, which oversees the Bard‘s final resting place, reports that over 800,000 visitors pay homage to his grave each year (Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, 2021).
The mystery of the missing skull has also sparked debates about the ethics of disturbing burial sites and the importance of respecting the final wishes of the deceased. Shakespeare‘s curse serves as a poignant reminder of the sanctity of the grave and the enduring power of his words.
As Michael Lewis explores in his article "A Dead Man‘s Curse" (2016), the allure of Shakespeare‘s grave and the missing skull is rooted in our fascination with the unknown and our desire to connect with the past. The mystery surrounding the Bard‘s final resting place has become an integral part of his legacy, inviting us to ponder the secrets that lie beneath the stone.
The Role of Modern Technology in Unraveling Mysteries
The 2016 GPR scan of Shakespeare‘s grave is a testament to the role of modern technology in shedding new light on historical mysteries. Non-invasive techniques like GPR, which uses radar pulses to create images of subsurface features, have revolutionized the field of archaeology, allowing researchers to explore burial sites and other historical locations without causing damage (Conyers, 2013).
The use of such technologies has not only provided new insights into Shakespeare‘s grave but has also opened up new avenues for research and discovery in other historical contexts. As Erica Utsi, a leading expert in GPR, notes in her book "Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Practice" (2017), these techniques have the potential to transform our understanding of the past and uncover long-buried secrets.
However, the application of modern technology to historical mysteries also raises important ethical questions. While non-invasive methods like GPR allow us to explore burial sites without disturbing the remains, the information gleaned from such investigations can still be sensitive and subject to interpretation. As researchers continue to employ these tools, it is crucial to consider the ethical implications and ensure that the dignity of the deceased is respected.
Conclusion: The Enduring Power of Shakespeare‘s Legacy
The curse on Shakespeare‘s grave and the enigma of his missing skull continue to captivate the imaginations of scholars and enthusiasts alike. The Bard‘s final resting place remains a site of pilgrimage for those who admire his timeless works and the enduring impact he has had on literature and culture.
While we may never know the true fate of Shakespeare‘s skull or the full extent of the curse‘s power, the mystery surrounding his grave adds to the allure and intrigue of the man behind the words. The legacy of William Shakespeare endures, not only through his plays and sonnets but also through the enduring enigma of his final resting place.
As we continue to explore and appreciate the works of the Bard, let us also remember the curse that guards his eternal slumber. Perhaps it is a reminder that even in death, Shakespeare‘s words and the mysteries that surround him have the power to captivate and inspire us, just as they have for centuries.
In the words of the Bard himself, "The mystery of human existence lies not in just staying alive, but in finding something to live for" (Hamlet, Act IV, Scene IV). The enduring fascination with Shakespeare‘s grave and the missing skull is a testament to the power of his legacy and the timeless relevance of his works.
As we unravel the enigma of Shakespeare‘s final resting place, we are reminded of the importance of respecting the past, embracing the unknown, and finding meaning in the mysteries that shape our world.
References
Argosy Magazine. (1879). How Shakespeare‘s skull was stolen. Argosy Magazine, 28(6), 448-452.
British Council. (2016). Shakespeare: The world‘s best-selling author of all time. https://www.britishcouncil.org/voices-magazine/shakespeare-worlds-best-selling-author-all-time
Conyers, L. B. (2013). Ground-penetrating radar for archaeology. AltaMira Press.
Greenblatt, S. (2004). Will in the world: How Shakespeare became Shakespeare. W. W. Norton & Company.
Houlbrooke, R. (1998). Death, religion, and the family in England, 1480-1750. Clarendon Press.
Kennedy, M. (2016, March 26). Shakespeare‘s skull probably stolen by grave robbers, study finds. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2016/mar/26/shakespeare-skull-stolen-by-grave-robbers-study-finds
Lewis, M. (2016). A dead man‘s curse. Lapham‘s Quarterly. https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/dead-mans-curse
Orlin, L. C. (2021). The private life of William Shakespeare. Oxford University Press.
Regan, G. (2016, April 23). The mystery of Shakespeare‘s missing skull. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/shakespeare-400th-anniversary-the-mystery-of-his-missing-skull-a6997211.html
Schoenbaum, S. (1991). Shakespeare‘s lives. Clarendon Press.
Shakespeare Birthplace Trust. (2021). Shakespeare‘s grave. https://www.shakespeare.org.uk/visit/shakespeares-grave/
Tarlow, S. (2011). Ritual, belief and the dead in early modern Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press.
The Gentleman‘s Magazine. (1884). Shakespeare‘s skull: The legend of its removal from the churchyard of Stratford-upon-Avon. The Gentleman‘s Magazine, 256, 206-212.
Utsi, E. C. (2017). Ground penetrating radar: Theory and practice. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Zolkover, A. (2016). The curse upon Shakespeare‘s grave. In D. Callaghan (Ed.), The Shakespearean world (pp. 419-433). Routledge.
